The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder.
He cuts off his story as he gets more emotional. Likewise, the woman in the apartment opposite testifies to the fact that she looked through the window of the EL train and saw the boy stabbing his father.
Juror Four pushes the point that the lawyers took the jurors to the el track and they were able to see what was happening on the other side. Juror Four proposes the compromise of trading chairs.
He sees the kid as not deserving of sympathy for his hard life, but conversely as all the more ready to lash out because of that hard life.
That happens to me, as least before I was a senator. Evidently, the woman tried to make herself look young and attractive because she was on show during the trial. Five most closely resembles the kid in age and circumstance and feels he is being targeted.
Juror Four notes that the double jeopardy law would prevent that man from being retried for the same crime. The Guard opens the window, surveys the room, and moves upstage to count the jurors as they enter.
Ironically, the 8th juror seems to be the only one who, at first, best abides by this nameless system and focuses on the boy.
Those elements will include: Four, on the other hand, reacts negatively to these displays of emotion. Therefore, Juror Number Eight, with the description given above, calls for a man of deep character and enormous depth of thought and humanity.
He analyses the content, by breaking down the component parts and analysing each point through examination of what has been presented. Contrastingly, the defence counsel appears disinterested in their legal responsibilities.
Also the prosecution team deliberately asked her to remove the eyeglasses so as not to draw attention to her poor eyesight.
Seven is preoccupied by entertainment; Eight listens silently, his physical isolation at the window foreshadowing his disagreement with the other jurors; Ten continues to show that he thinks of the kid as a member of a group that is different and ought to be looked down on.
Chaffee tells about deductive reasoning. That the old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing. Active Themes As the jurors enter, some go to the water cooler, Juror Five lights a pipe, and Juror Seven opens the window a bit wider, while still others stand and lean on their chairs.
Nine is aloof, but polite. In a sense this depersonalises the jury members to show that their personalities should not play a factor. Stubbornness and Taking a Stand Prejudice vs. Evidently, as Rose points out, the personalities of those who present the evidence play a large role. The 8th juror also states that just because the boy cannot remember the details of the movie does not automatically disprove his alibi or his guilt.
However, the fact that the film version, which is also a classic, adds information about Juror Eight does not take away from the validity of the play's description.
Yet Ten focuses not on this evidence, but on the character of impoverished people. Active Themes As the guard goes to get the switch knife, Juror Four leads the jury in establishing the facts surrounding the knife.Instant downloads of all LitChart PDFs (including Twelve Angry Men).
LitCharts Teacher Editions. Teach your students to analyze literature like LitCharts does. 12 Angry Men Juror 8. Reginald Rose’s ’12 Angry Men’ brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father.
The play is interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama. Analysis Of The Play ' 12 Angry Men ' By Reginald Rose Words | 5 Pages. Feature Article Prejudice is like a ghost, it has been haunting the human race since the very beginning.
Maddison Hinte investigates the way prejudice affects our society by changing our views of. "Twelve Angry Men" did not begin on the stage as is often the case. Instead, the popular play was adapted from Reginald Rose's live teleplay that debuted on a CBS Studios' series, "Studio One in Hollywood." Inthe famous film adaptation starring Henry Fonda was produced, and the stage play did not debut until Character Analysis On Juror 8 For 12 Angry Men.
Reginald Rose’s ’12 Angry Men’ brings 12 jurors together in a room to decide whether a young foreign boy is guilty of killing his father. The play is interwoven with dynamic characterisation, striking symbolism and intense moments of drama.
12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
Study Guides Q & A.Download